1. kiriamaya:


    stand up for girls and women who don’t like to read. stand up for girls and women who can’t read. stand up for girls and women with low IQs. stand up for girls and women who can’t write. stand up for girls and women whose access to education has been…

  2. oystergirlrhymes:

    This semester I went to the White Privilege Conference in Madison, WI for my honors seminar about examining privilege. I made a poster about the behaviors of particular white female musicians who appropriate other cultures as a means of identity and sexualize/objectify WOC as a means of displaying sexual agency and social power. All under the guise of “empowerment”.

    This is my take on the knowledge I found through seminar and readings, (esp. online articles) so in no way do I claim these ideas or concepts as my own.

    (via tranarchy-and-chaos)


  3. my RD and housing director just emailed me reminding me that I still need to follow the rules as if i were a guy and i emailed him back saying basically “yeah i anticipated the university policy to be transphobic. whatever. is there anywhere I can read the policies on housing particularly? like in terms of structure and demarcations via institutionally imposed gender?”


  4. "The Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution abolished slavery and involuntary servitude, except as punishment for a crime."

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    except as punishment for a crime.

    Think about who’s in jail and why. 

    (via amerikkkan-stories)

    and that “crime” could be anything they felt like charging you with

    (via boygeorgemichaelbluth)

    This was how the myth of Black criminality started, for the record. After the abolition of slavery, a lot of states made laws targeting Black people specifically, and then put them on chain gangs to get free labor from them.

    Oh, and the US is still disproportionately incarcerating Black people and private prisons are making huge amounts off them.

    (via bunnybotbaby)

    This is one of those pieces of information I wish had like 200 million notes on tumblr.

    (via kenobi-wan-obi)

    meanwhile the dea teamed up with the cca

    (via cxnfvsed-and-cxnflicted)

    Yeah, I believe that black people are twice as likely to be arrested and convicted for committing the same crimes as a white person. Draw your own conclusions.

    (via yesiamtheblack)

    Reblogging this because everytime in real life I’ve said Slavery didn’t really end I’ve been dismissed as crazy.

    (via locsgirl)

    I’ll reblog this every time it comes up on my dash. People need to know!

    (via andshegotthegirl)

    All of this.

    (via thisiseverydayracism)

    Additionally, in Britain, three times as likely to be arrested.

    Six times as likely for a drug offence.

    (via moniquill)

    (via deewright)

  5. storyofagayboy:


    Grindr, a popular app for gay men, now carries an urgent warning for users in Egypt. According to many sources, Egyptian authorities are posing as LGBT people on various social media sites to identify and arrest homosexual people. The app is urging users in the region to proceed with extreme caution, especially when identifying themselves or arranging meetings/hookups. While so far the focus seems to be on gay men, all LGBT people in the area should be cautious. Reports show that Egyptian police have carried out violent raids on private homes which lead to the arrests of several gay men. These men were then subjected to disturbing medical “exams.” Police also raided an LGBT party last year, violently arresting many and sentencing them to up to 12 years hard labour. While homosexuality is not illegal in Egypt, athorities are using sexual deviance, debauchery and insulting public morals as terms for the crackdown. Many claim this fresh attack on the LGBT community is lead by President Abdel-Fattah Al-Sisi who wishes for his country to be more Islamic.

    For all of my LGBT friends here on tumblr, please be extremely careful as this situation develops. Remember to clear your search history, use private browsing if possible, and be extremely cautious with who you talk to online.

    (via wittgensteinsmister)


  6. i like how “o holy night” makes me feel like history will have no end and we get to have cool experiences on earth here forever, even if i die.


  7. cisyphus:







    pomo Halloween costume: the big other

    pomo Halloween costume: l’objet a

    pomo Halloween costume: hauntology

    pomo halloween costume: surplus value

    pomo halloween costume: the body without organs

    pomo halloween costume: homo sacer

    pomo halloween costume: the child

    pomo halloween costume: in the same things i wear every day

  8. frantzfandom:




    And could we throw in the fact that if you were for a sensible equality  you should be demanding not bombing anybody and not demand that just different people should have been killed?

    Okay kids, gather round because you seem to be under the impression that this website owes you an education AND that your education on this subject is sufficient. Neither of those is true, but I’m gonna help you out anyway!

    First, let’s discuss the “reasons for dropping the bomb” that are commonly given, but also happen to be totally wrong:

    • Japan wasn’t willing to surrender

    Actually, Japan was totally down to surrender! America was very good at cracking Japanese codes, and had intercepted several diplomatic messages sent to other countries where Japan expressed the terms of their conditions, with the only major term being that the emperor remain in power (Which would have been necessary to ensure a peaceful transition to foreign government for the Japanese people). Harry Truman ignored these messages and prolonged the war until the completion of the atomic bomb so that it could be used. More on that later.

    In his 1965 study, Atomic Diplomacy: Hiroshima and Potsdam (pp. 107, 108), historian Gar Alperovitz writes:

    Although Japanese peace feelers had been sent out as early as September 1944 (and [China’s] Chiang Kai-shek had been approached regarding surrender possibilities in December 1944), the real effort to end the war began in the spring of 1945. This effort stressed the role of the Soviet Union …

    In mid-April [1945] the [US] Joint Intelligence Committee reported that Japanese leaders were looking for a way to modify the surrender terms to end the war. The State Department was convinced the Emperor was actively seeking a way to stop the fighting.

    • It would have saved more lives than it took

    Nah. Japan was actually on it’s last legs, and wouldn’t have been able to fight much longer at all, thanks to effective embargoes, blockades, and traditional bombing. They had all but run out of fuel, ammunition, and other war supplies.

    Admiral William Leahy – the highest ranking member of the U.S. military from 1942 until retiring in 1949, who was the first de facto Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, and who was at the center of all major American military decisions in World War II – wrote (pg. 441):

    It is my opinion that the use of this barbarous weapon at Hiroshima and Nagasaki was of no material assistance in our war against Japan. The Japanese were already defeated and ready to surrender because of the effective sea blockade and the successful bombing with conventional weapons.

    • Destroying two major military targets helped us out

    LOL Nagasaki and Hiroshima weren’t selected because they were military targets (Because they weren’t military targets at all!). They were selected because they were large cities where the bombs would have the most devastating affect.

    President Truman steadfastly defended his use of the atomic bomb, claiming that it “saved millions of lives” by bringing the war to a quick end. Justifying his decision, he went so far as to declare: “The world will note that the first atomic bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, a military base. That was because we wished in this first attack to avoid, insofar as possible, the killing of civilians.”

    This was a preposterous statement. In fact, almost all of the victims were civilians, and the United States Strategic Bombing Survey (issued in 1946) stated in its official report: “Hiroshima and Nagasaki were chosen as targets because of their concentration of activities and population.”

    General George Marshall agreed:

    Contemporary documents show that Marshall felt “these weapons might first be used against straight military objectives such as a large naval installation and then if no complete result was derived from the effect of that, he thought we ought to designate a number of large manufacturing areas from which the people would be warned to leave–telling the Japanese that we intend to destroy such centers….”

    As the document concerning Marshall’s views suggests, the question of whether the use of the atomic bomb was justified turns  … on whether the bombs had to be used against a largely civilian target rather than a strictly military target—which, in fact, was the explicit choice since although there were Japanese troops in the cities, neither Hiroshima nor Nagasaki was deemed militarily vital by U.S. planners. (This is one of the reasons neither had been heavily bombed up to this point in the war.) Moreover, targeting [at Hiroshima and Nagasaki] was aimed explicitly on non-military facilities surrounded by workers’ homes.

    Now, let’s discuss the the actual reasons for dropping the bomb:

    • To send a message to the Soviet Union
    • That’s it
    • It was strictly political
    History.com notes:

    By August 1945, relations between the Soviet Union and the United States had deteriorated badly. The Potsdam Conference between U.S. President Harry S. Truman, Russian leader Joseph Stalin, and Winston Churchill (before being replaced by Clement Attlee) ended just four days before the bombing of Hiroshima. The meeting was marked by recriminations and suspicion between the Americans and Soviets. Russian armies were occupying most of Eastern Europe. Truman and many of his advisers hoped that the U.S. atomic monopoly might offer diplomatic leverage with the Soviets. In this fashion, the dropping of the atomic bomb on Japan can be seen as the first shot of the Cold War.

    New Scientist reportedin 2005:

    The US decision to drop atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki in 1945 wasmeant to kick-start the Cold Warrather than end the Second World War, according to two nuclear historians who say they have new evidence backing the controversial theory.

    Causing a fission reaction in several kilograms of uranium and plutonium and killing over 200,000 people 60 years ago wasdone more to impress the Soviet Union than to cow Japan, they say. And the US President who took the decision, Harry Truman, was culpable, they add.

    New studies of the US, Japanese and Soviet diplomatic archives suggest that Truman’s main motive was to limit Soviet expansion in Asia, Kuznick claims. Japan surrendered because the Soviet Union began an invasion a few days after the Hiroshima bombing, not because of the atomic bombs themselves, he says.

    According to an account by Walter Brown, assistant to then-US secretary of state James Byrnes, Truman agreed at a meeting three days before the bomb was dropped on Hiroshima that Japan was “looking for peace”. Truman was told by his army generals, Douglas Macarthur and Dwight Eisenhower, and his naval chief of staff, William Leahy, that there was no military need to use the bomb.

    “Impressing Russia was more important than ending the war in Japan,” says Selden.

    So let’s recap:

    Harry Truman purposely killed hundreds of thousands of Japanese civilians to make a political statement.

    The US detonated the world’s first weapon of mass destruction simply to send a message to the Soviet Union and stop Red expansion into Asia.

    I’m not saying the fact that one group of people (Who happened to be Asian) was viewed as disposable just to put on a show for another group of people (Who happened to also be white) is an act of racism.

    I’m also not saying that we should examine the fact that no German or Italian families living in the US were put into containment camps out of fear of spies, but pretty much all Asian-Americans were (Because Asia is a country, obviously).

    I AM saying that maybe you should consider that your history lessons in school were taught from books written by old white men, and they might read a little differently if they weren’t. 

    Oh, and I’ll leave on this little note from President Truman’s youth. Again, I’m not saying he’s racist or anything, but…

    In Hiroshima: Why America Dropped the Bomb, Japanese American historian Ronald Takaki writes about the man who made the final decision to destroy two Japanese cities, President Harry Truman. This was the same man who, when he was younger, wrote the following in a letter to his future wife, Bess:

    I think one man is as good as another, so long as he’s honest and decent and not a nigger or a Chinaman. My uncle Will says that the Lord made a white man of dust, a n*gger from mud, then threw up what was left and it came down a Chinaman. He does hate Chinese and Japs. So do I. It is race prejudice I guess. But I am strongly of the opinion that negroes ought to be in Africa, yellow men in Asia, and white men in Europe and America.

    Hey look, sources where you can go and educate yourself about all of this, and fact check me while you’re at it!

    deleting most of the dumb white bullshit for the historical mic drops

    (via idreamtiwasagoddess)

  9. soupery:

    these puppies believe in you, and you should too

    (via silencethebadwolf)


  10. people who misgender you intentionally when you’re not around are literal walking piles of shit


  11. Using the correct pronouns is just as important when the person isnt there to hear it.


    1. Cop Apologists: Darren Wilson is just one cop! Other cops aren't Darren Wilson!
    2. Other Cops: *wearing "I Am Darren Wilson" bracelets*
  12. (Source: furything, via skeletalinfancy)


  13. Anonymous said: Hello. Idk why but you were on my heart today! I followed you a looong time ago & you played a great deal in helping me get over my inner struggle with "morality" at what was probably the darkest point in my life. Your words, insight & prayer for me really helped. I see you're not Tom anymore, but Kit. And Kit I just wanna say thank you for the role you played in enlightening me about God's love/nature etc. I hope all is well!! And in return, is there anything you'd like prayer for?

    this is a really sweet message, anon!! <3

    pray for my situation at school and my rooming situation next year.

  14. mickeysdicksmasherseasonpass:



    Today was wash day


    who is this incredibly lovely babe omg